PROTOTIPE ‘PENYULUH AGAMA BUDDHA’ KAJIAN LINGUISTIK KOGNITIF
(Prototype of ‘Penyuluh Agama Buddha’: A Cognitive Linguistics Study)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47323/ujss.v3i1.182Keywords:
: Prototype, Counselor, Buddhist, Cognitif, LinguisticAbstract
Prototype in linguistics field is a mean to determine the level of meaning gradations, where the people have their own concepts, models or views on something. This is a descriptive qualitative research supported by quantitative data. The results show that the most important component of prototype of ‘Penyuluh Agama’ is moral according to the concept of sila (morality) as the basis of Buddha’s teaching implementation. In addition, the prototype of ‘penyuluh agama Buddha’ is based on including two variables, gender, and council.. The two variables have different perspectives and influences on the prototype of ‘penyuluh agama Buddha’. However, most consider the moral component as the most important component. Moreover, the component of the same council is also considered important.
References
Aminu, N. (2021). IMPELEMENTATION OF KEMUHAMADIYAH EDUCATION IN FORMING STUDENT’S CHARACTERS: (Penerapan Pendidikan Kemuhamadiyah Al Islam dalam Pembentukan Karakter Siswa). Uniqbu Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.47323/ujss.v2i1.105
Arimi, Sailal. 2015. Linguistik Kognitif Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Sastra Indonesia Fakultas Ilmu Budaya-A.Com Press.
Budiawan, Yusuf Sidiq R. 2013. Bahasa, Kognisi, dan Budaya Prototipe Semantik: Cinta. Makalah UGM
Chauchard, Paul. 1983. Bahasa dan Pikiran. Dialihbahasakan oleh Widyamartaya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Coleman, Linda, dan Paul Kay. 1981. Prototype Semantics: the English Word Lie. Language, Vol. 57, No. 1 Hal, 26-44
Evans, Vyvyans. 2007. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Evans, Vyvyan dan Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2016. Prospect and Problems of Prototype Theory. Diacronia, Volume 3 No. 1, Hal 1–16.
Geeraerts, Dirk dan Hubert Cuyckens. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Iye, R., Nurlatu, J., Susiati, S., Taufik, T., Harziko, H., & Abida, F. I. N. (2022). The Symbolic Meaning of Wedding Offerings in Buru Island. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 8(1), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v8i1.1797
Kushartanti, U. Y. dan M. Lauder. 2010. Pesona Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Lipka, L. 1986. Linguistics across Historical and Geo-graphical Boundaries. Berlin: Walter.
Mastoyo, Tri. 2007. Pengantar (Metode) Penelitian Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Carasvatibooks.
Miller, George A. & Philip Johnson-Laird. 1976. Language and Perception. Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Priastana, Jo. 2005. Komunikasi dan Dharmaduta. Jakarta: Yasodhara Puteri
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Human Categorization. Studies in Cross Linguistic Psychology. London: Academic Press. Hal. 1-49.
Sam, B., Iye, R., Ohoibor, M., Umanailo, M. C. B., Rusdi, M., Rahman, A. B. D., & Hajar, I. (2019). Female Feminism in the Customary Island of Buru. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res, 8(8), 1877-1880.
Sutedi, Dedi. 2003. Pengenalan Pendekatan Linguistik Kognitif dalam Penelitian Bahasa. Makalah Temu Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Linguistik Bahasa Jepang II.
Sofie, M. S. ., Iye, R., Nur Abida, F. I. ., Bugis, R. ., Musyawir, M., & Yulismayanti, Y. (2022). The Effectiveness of Online Learning on Buru State High School Students on Learning Achievement in Covid-19 Situation. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.20230
Yohani, Adisthi Martha. 2016. Kotozawa dalam Kajian Linguistik Kognitif: Penerapan Gaya Bahasa Sinekdok. Izumi, Vol. 5, No. 2. Hal. 24-32.
Zakiyah, Millatuz, Noveria Anggraeni Fiaji, dan Prima Zulvarina. 2018. Semantik Prototipe Korupsi: Kajian Linguistik Kognitif. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Volume 11, Nomor 2, Hal. 163–174
