THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PREVIEW, ASK QUESTIONS, READ, AND SUMMARIZE STRATEGY IN READING CLASS: AN ACTION RESEARCH STUDY
(Penerapan Strategi Preview, Ask Questions, Read, and Summarize di Pelajaran Membaca: An Action Research)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47323/ujss.v2i3.159Abstract
This research aimed at improving students’ reading ability by using PAQRS strategy. This research applied a classroom action research (CAR) design that conducted in two cycles consisted of four stages: planning, action, observation and reflection. Each cycle consist of four meetings. In collecting the data, the researcher conducted tests, interview, and observation. The data is presented quantitatively as the primary data and quantitatively as supporting data. The findings of the study showed that there were 18.91% students who achieved the minimum completeness criteria and the average score was 67.35 in the first cycle test. While there were 81.08% students who achieved the minimum completeness criteria and the average score were 76.72 in the second cycle test. The result of the research indicated that students’ achievement is increase from cycle 1 to cycle 2. The conclusion of this study is that PAQRS strategy can successfully improve students’ reading skills.
References
Andrew, & Johnson, P. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing. Rowman and Littlefield Education.
Brown H., & Douglas. (2004). Language Assessment Principle and Classroom Practice. San Francisco University.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching reading, second edition. In Teaching and Researching Reading, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743
Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2019). The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners' reading strategy use. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1616522. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1998). The Action Research Planner (2nd ed.). Deakin University Press.
Kung, F.-W. (2019). Teaching second language reading comprehension: the effects of classroom materials and reading strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1364252
Mikulechy, & S, B. (2011). A Short Course In Teaching Reading. Pearson education.
Moreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your Impact. The American Library Association.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Draft analytical Frameworks. PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks, May 2016, 1–170. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/PISA-2018-draft-frameworks.pdf
Reutzel, D. R., Smith, J. A., & Fawson, P. C. (2005). An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(3), 276–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.07.002
Rosmayanti, V., & Yahrif, M. (2019). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ROLEPLAY ACTIVITIES. 5(1), 77–92.
Wormeli, R. (2005). Summarization in Any Subject: 50 Techniques to Improve Student Learning. (Associatio).
Zwierz, J. (2004). Building Reading Comprehension Habits. International Reading Association.
