THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TONGUE TWISTERS STRATEGY TO INCRAESE THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY

(Efektivitas Strategi Tongue Twister Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berbicara Siswa)

Authors

  • Nirwana AR Universitas Iqra Buru
  • Suraya Mukadar Universitas Iqra Buru
  • Tri Kurnia Badu Universitas Iqra Buru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47323/ujss.v1i3.80

Keywords:

Speaking ability, tongue twisters strategy, direct interaction strategy

Abstract

Tongue twisters have been explored by some researchers to increase the students’ speaking ability. The researcher has an opportunity to research significant effectiveness difference between tongue twisters strategy and direct interaction strategy to increase students’ speaking accuracy (pronunciation) and fluency (content). A quasi-experimental design is employed with two classes of the eight graders of  SMP Muhammadiyah 12 Perumnas Makassar  selected purposively as the sample.  The data is obtained through a pre-test and a post-test. The findings are analyzed using statistically using independent t-test procedure. Based on the post-test calculation the value of t-test is higher than the value of t-table, 2,04 <  3,03. According to the result, the alternative hypothesis is not rejected. It can be concluded that there is a significant effectiveness difference between students' ability to speak English who are taught by using tongue twisters strategy and those who are guided by using direct interaction strategy on post-test of speaking accuracy and fluency. Tongue twisters strategy is more effective in increasing the students’ speaking ability on speaking accuracy and fluency than direct interaction strategy. Based on students’ speaking products, it can be show that students understand the role of speaking. The students’ speech sound is more natural.

Author Biographies

Nirwana AR, Universitas Iqra Buru

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Suraya Mukadar, Universitas Iqra Buru

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Tri Kurnia Badu, Universitas Iqra Buru

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris 

References

Alex, B. (1996-2012). Retrieved from http://www.kindspot.com.au/schoolzone/ Speech Tongue Twister+4108+308+article.htm. (August 27th, 2012)

Alicia Howe, eHoe Contributor, 2012. http://www.ehow.com/list_5951101_esl-tongue-twistergames.html# ixzz22U3qtsUg. [August 27th, 2012]

Bennett, R., & Bennett, S. T. (1991). free activities you can do with your child. Holbrook, MA: Bob Adams

Bin-Tahir, S. Z., Atmowardoyo, H., Dollah, S., & Rinantanti, Y. (2017). Multilingual Instructional Model of Pesantren Schools in Indonesia. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(6), 1210-1216. Byrne, Donn. 1987. Teaching Oral English. Singapore. Longman Singapore Publisher

Chastain, Kenneth. 1976. Developing Second Language. Skills. Theory to Practice. New York: Mc. Nally College.

Center On Innovation & Improvement (2008). Five Meanings Of Direct Instruction.

Deborah, M., Laura, C. B., Ilene M. F., & Charles A. P. (2014). Phoneme specific interference in reading: the tongue twisters effect revisited. Journal of Wiley International Reading Association, 26 (1), 87-103. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/747733

Elisabeth, P. (1999-2012). Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/how_2301445_ use-improve-tongue-twister.html [2012, August 25].

Fatchul, M., Roshi, A., & Rizky, A. (2017). Tongue twister, students’ pronunciation ability, and learning styles. 8(4), 365-383. Journal of Arab World English. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no4.25

Florez MaryAnn, Cunningham, 1999. Improving Adult English Language Learners’ Speaking Ability. Accessed from www.CAELA.com.

Gay, L.R. (1981). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application Second Edition, Ohio: Charles E.

Gersten, R., Woodward, J., & Darch, C. (1986). Direct Instruction: A Research-Based Approach To Curriculum Design And Teaching. Exceptional Children, 53, 17-31

Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2008). Cascading Activation From Phonological Planning to Articulatory Processes: Evidence from Tongue Twisters. Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Science Brown University & Department of Linguistics Northwestern University

Harmer Jeremy. 2001. The practice of English Language Teaching. England. Pearson education limited.

Iye, R. Jl Prof Dr HAR Basalamah No, and Namlea-Kab Buru.". TUTURAN DALAM PROSESI LAMARAN PERNIKAHAN DI TOMIA KABUPATEN WAKATOBI." Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja.

Mary, B., & Karen, C. (2018), Segmental speech error data elicited at prosodically-defined locations in tongue twisters. Journal of Elsevier, 20, 411-414. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.004

Matthew, G. & Sheila, E. B. (2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: evidence from tongue twisters in the USA. Journal of Language and Cognitive Processes, 21 (6), 649–683. DOI: 10.1080/01690960500181332

Laidlaw, 2006. http://www.actionresearch. net/writings/china/chendan.htm [October 15th, 2012]

Ramelan. 2003. English Phonetic. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Shofiatu, F. (2019). Using the tongue twister technique to improve students’ pronunciation (undergraduate degree’s thesis). English Language Education, Faculty of Cultures, and Language of Islamic Institute Surakarta, Surakarta.

Sinta, H. N. (2014). Classroom interaction analysis in Indonesia EFL speaking class. Journal of English Education, 2(2), 124-132. ISSN 2301-7554. Retrieved from http://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEE.

Susiati, S., & Iye, R. (2018). Kajian Geografi Bahasa dan Dialek di Sulawesi Tenggara: Analisis Dialektometri. Gramatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan. 6 (2), 137-151.

Susiati, S., Iye, R., & Suherman, L. O. A. (2019). Hot Potatoes Multimedia Applications in Evaluation of Indonesian Learning In SMP Students in Buru District. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(4), 556-570.

Joyce, K. (2002). Pronunciation activities, Practical activities to help students with English pronunciation. British Council. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/

Katherine K. W., Lise A., & Elizabeth A. F. (2012). Semantic category moderates phonological priming of proper name retrieval during tip-of-the-tongue states in the USA. Journal of Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (4), 561-576. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.658408

Kouicem, K. (2009). The effect of classroom interaction developing learner’s speaking skill (Master’s thesis). English Foreign Language, Faculty of Letters and Languages of Constantine University, Constantine.

Yara, A. (2018). Improving Students’ Pronunciation by Using Tongue Twisters Technique (undergraduate degree’s thesis). English Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Tanjung Pura University, Tanjung Pura.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-16

How to Cite

AR, N., Mukadar, S., & Badu, T. K. . (2020). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TONGUE TWISTERS STRATEGY TO INCRAESE THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY: (Efektivitas Strategi Tongue Twister Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berbicara Siswa). Uniqbu Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.47323/ujss.v1i3.80