NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CHARACTERS ON ENGLISH HAND BOOK USED BY ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE (EFL) TEACHERS

Authors

  • Samsu T Lecturer and Student of English Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia,
  • Andi Sadapotto Lecturer and Student of English Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47323/ujss.v3i2.216

Keywords:

the value of character education, curriculum 2013

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the English textbooks used by teachers in the learning and teaching process and to determine the suitability of the character education values ​​in English textbooks with the character education values ​​set in the 2013 curriculum. The English text used is 12 values ​​of character education out of 18 total values ​​of character education in the 2013 curriculum. The research design used is descriptive qualitative research method because the data collected is in the form of words and does not use numbers. The researcher chose this method because the data obtained were descriptive data, then analyzed and described in the form of words and language. descriptive qualitative is a research method that utilizes qualitative data and is described descriptively. The results showed that the value of character education in English textbooks used by teachers in the teaching and learning process did not fully contain the value of character education in the 2013 curriculum. There were only 12 values ​​of character education from 18 values ​​of character education based on the 2013 curriculum in the English textbook. Which means that there are 6 values ​​of character education based on the 2013 curriculum that are not contained in the English textbook. As a conclusion, the suitability between the values ​​of character education in English textbooks and character education in the 2013 curriculum is not fully appropriate.

References

A Setiadi. 2016. Strategies for Increasing Competitive Advantage of Sdm in the Field of Mea. Cakrawala.

Anwas. 2016. Televisi Mendidik Karakter Bangsa: Harapan dan Tantangan, dalam Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta: Balitbang Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional 16.

Amirullah Syarbini. 2012. Buku Pintar Pendidikan Karakter; Panduan Lengkap Mendidik karakter Anak di Sekolah, Madrasah, dan Rumah, Prima Pustaka: Jakarta.

Bin-Tahir, S. Z., Suriaman, A., & Rinantanti, Y. (2019). Designing English Syllabus for Multilingual Students at Pesantren Schools. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3.3), 5-27.

Bin-Tahir, S., Hanapi, H., Mufidah, N., Rahman, A., & Tuharea, V. U. (2019). Revitalizing The Maluku Local Language In Multilingual Learning Model. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 8(10).

Elva Ayu Wardani, et al. 2019. Analysis of Character Education Values In The English Textbook For The Twelfth Grade Senior High School Students : Bahasa Inggris SMA/SMK. Jember University.

Fakrur Rozi. 2012. Model Pendidikan Karakter dan Moralitas Siswa di Sekolah Islam Modern; Studi pada SMP Pondok Pesantren Selamat Kendal. IAIN Walisongo : Semarang.

Hidayat. 2018. Design of interactive learning media to pronunciation characters and words English for blind children. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 407.

Imam Gunawan. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan 17 (1), 52-70.

Ida Ayu Putri Brahmantini. et al. 2013. An Analysis of a Textbook Entitled Bahasa Inggris Untuk SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X Used In The Teaching English at The Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 3 Singaraja, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

John W. Creswell and J. David Creswell. 2018. Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist, 73 (1), 26-46.

Kemendiknas. 2011. Panduan Pelaksanaan pendidikan Karakter. Jakarta:Balitbang Puskurbuk.

Mahulette, Astrid (2014) Analisis Nilai-Nilai Karakter dalam Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris di SMP di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. S2 thesis, UNY.

Mela Meliawati and Fuad Abdul Hamied. 2019. Content Analysis on English Textbooks for Class X Title English for High School. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.

Saidna Z, B. T., Haryanto, A., Syarifuddin, D., & Yulini, R. (2017). Multilingual Instructional Model of Pesantren Schools in Indonesia. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(6), 1210-1216.

S Idris, ZA Tabrani. 2017. The Reality of the Concept of Humanism Education in the Context of Islamic Education. Jurnal Edukasi: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling 3 (1), 96-113.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta 28.

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. Penerbit CV. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Suharsimi Arikunto. 2016. Basics of educational evaluation. Bumi Aksara.

Tahir, S. Z. B. (2021, March). Designing English teaching model at the remote area schools of Maluku in Covid-19 pandemic situation. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Universitas Iqra Buru.

Tuharea, V. U., Tahir, S. Z. B., Ami, I. S. O., & Rahman, A. (2020). Buru Language Conservation Through Sustainable Mulok Learning In Buru Regency:(Konservasi Bahasa Buru melalui Pembelajaran Mulok Berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Buru). Uniqbu Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 49-55.

UU RI Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen serta UU RI No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sisdiknas, Ibid. h. 74

Zubaedi. 2011. Desain Pendidikan Karakter : Konsepsi dan Aplikasinya dalam Lembaga Pendidikan. Kencana: Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-01

How to Cite

T, S., & Sadapotto, A. (2022). NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CHARACTERS ON ENGLISH HAND BOOK USED BY ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE (EFL) TEACHERS. Uniqbu Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.47323/ujss.v3i2.216